EU Fines Elon Musk's X $140 Million Over Deceptive Blue Checkmarks

EU Fines Elon Musk's X $140 Million Over Deceptive Blue Checkmarks

EU Fines Elon Musk's X $140 Million Over Deceptive Blue Checkmarks The European Union just dropped a regulatory hammer on Elon Musk's X, hitting th...

Dec 6, 2025
5 min read

Don't Miss the Good Stuff

Get tech news that matters delivered weekly. Join 50,000+ readers.

The European Union just dropped a regulatory hammer on Elon Musk's X, hitting the social media platform with a $140 million fine that's already sparking a transatlantic showdown. In what marks the first enforcement action under Europe's sweeping Digital Services Act, regulators announced Friday that X violated transparency rules through its paid verification system, opaque advertising practices, and restrictions on researcher data access.

You can also set us as a preferred source in Google Search/News by clicking the button.

Here's the thing: this isn't just about money. At €120 million, the penalty represents a symbolic opening salvo in what could become a protracted battle between European regulators and American tech giants. The fine comes after a two-year investigation that zeroed in on X's controversial decision to turn blue checkmarks from verification badges into subscription perks.

European Commission officials outlined three core violations that landed X in hot water. First up: what they're calling the "deceptive design" of those now-infamous blue checkmarks. When Musk bought Twitter in 2022 and rebranded it as X, he transformed verification from something platforms earned through identity confirmation into something anyone could buy for $8 per month. According to EU regulators, this creates confusion about account authenticity and exposes users to scams and impersonation fraud.

The second violation targets X's advertising transparency - or lack thereof. Under the Digital Services Act, platforms operating in Europe must maintain public repositories showing who's paying for ads, what those ads contain, and who they're targeting. Regulators found X's ad library falls short, making it harder for researchers and watchdogs to spot coordinated influence campaigns or fraudulent advertisements.

Finally, and this is where it gets particularly interesting for the research community, X allegedly put up "unnecessary barriers" preventing academics from accessing public data. The DSA requires large platforms to provide qualified researchers with data access to study systemic risks, but according to the Commission, X's restrictions effectively undermine research into issues like political manipulation and coordinated disinformation campaigns.

Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission's executive vice president for tech sovereignty, didn't mince words. "Deceiving users with blue checkmarks, obscuring information on ads and shutting out researchers have no place online in the EU," she said in a statement.

"With the DSA's first non-compliance decision, we are holding X responsible for undermining users' rights and evading accountability."

The reaction from across the Atlantic was, predictably, swift and fiery. A day before the official announcement, Vice President JD Vance posted on X, calling rumors of the fine an attack on free speech. "The EU should be supporting free speech not attacking American companies over garbage," Vance posted Thursday. Senator Marco Rubio took it further, framing the penalty as "an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments."

Musk's own response was characteristically blunt: a single-word "Bulls---" posted in reply to the European Commission's announcement. The billionaire has long positioned himself as a free speech absolutist, framing regulatory actions as censorship attempts rather than consumer protection measures.

What makes this situation particularly tense is the timing. The Trump administration has been pressuring European officials to soften tech regulations, with threats of retaliatory tariffs hanging in the air. This fine represents Europe's first major test of whether it will stand firm on its digital rulebook despite political pressure from Washington.

The technical details matter here. X now has 60 days to explain how it will fix the blue checkmark issue and 90 days to submit plans for improving ad transparency and researcher access. Failure to comply could trigger additional penalties - the DSA allows fines up to 6% of a company's global revenue, which for X could mean hundreds of millions more.

Contrast this with how the EU handled TikTok in a separate decision also announced Friday. The Chinese-owned platform avoided fines by offering to redesign its service to meet transparency requirements. That cooperative approach stands in stark contrast to Musk's combative stance, highlighting what regulators see as a fundamental difference in compliance attitudes.

"We are not here to impose the highest fines," Virkkunen told reporters. "We are here to make sure that our digital legislation is enforced and if you comply with our rules, you don't get the fine. And it's as simple as that."

For the tech industry watching closely, this decision sends a clear signal: Europe's Digital Services Act isn't just theoretical legislation. It's enforceable, and regulators are willing to take on even the most high-profile American companies. With investigations still ongoing into X's content moderation practices and election integrity measures, this $140 million fine might just be the opening act in a much longer regulatory drama.

The real question now is whether Musk will fight this in European courts, potentially setting up a landmark legal battle over digital sovereignty, or whether X will follow TikTok's lead and negotiate changes to avoid further penalties. Either way, the battle lines between Silicon Valley and Brussels have never been clearer.

Share this article

Help others discover this content